Review



human hcc cell lines hepg2  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC human hcc cell lines hepg2
    Human Hcc Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 31385 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc cell lines hepg2/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 31385 article reviews
    human hcc cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC human hcc cell lines hepg2
    Human Hcc Cell Lines Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc cell lines hepg2/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc cell lines hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress human hcc organoid culture kit
    Clinical relevance of SMOX , CERS1 , and SPHK1 expression and combining effects of sorafenib with spermine or sphingosine in <t>HCC</t> organoids. (A-B) The overall survival rates of liver cancer patients in TCGA were plotted according to the expression levels of the SMOX metabolic enzyme of spermine (A) and the CERS1 and SPHK1 metabolic enzymes of sphingosine (B) using KM Plotter. (C-D) The relative gene expression of SMOX (C) and SPHK1 (D) in normal (left) and tumor (right) tissues from adrenal cancer (Adrenal), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), bladder cancer (Bladder), breast cancer (Breast), colon cancer (Colon), esophageal cancer (Esoph), liver cancer (Liver), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), ovary cancer (Ovary), pancreatic cancer (Pancreas), prostate cancer (Prostate), rectal cancer (Rectum), renal clear cell cancer (RCC), renal CH (RCH), renal PA (RPA), skin cancer (Skin), stomach cancer (Stomach), testis cancer (Testis), thyroid cancer (Thyroid), uterine CS cancer (UCS), and uterine EC (UEC). *: Mann-Whitney p<0.05 and expression >10 in tumor or normal tissue. (E-F) Patient-derived <t>HCC</t> <t>SNU-423-CO</t> organoids were treated with sorafenib with and without spermine or sphingosine for 6 days. (E) Representative images were obtained using a confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( F ) Organoid formation efficiency and cell viability were assessed by CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. The relative organoid cell viability was plotted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
    Human Hcc Organoid Culture Kit, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc organoid culture kit/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc organoid culture kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    ATCC human hcc cell lines hep3b
    Clinical relevance of SMOX , CERS1 , and SPHK1 expression and combining effects of sorafenib with spermine or sphingosine in <t>HCC</t> organoids. (A-B) The overall survival rates of liver cancer patients in TCGA were plotted according to the expression levels of the SMOX metabolic enzyme of spermine (A) and the CERS1 and SPHK1 metabolic enzymes of sphingosine (B) using KM Plotter. (C-D) The relative gene expression of SMOX (C) and SPHK1 (D) in normal (left) and tumor (right) tissues from adrenal cancer (Adrenal), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), bladder cancer (Bladder), breast cancer (Breast), colon cancer (Colon), esophageal cancer (Esoph), liver cancer (Liver), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), ovary cancer (Ovary), pancreatic cancer (Pancreas), prostate cancer (Prostate), rectal cancer (Rectum), renal clear cell cancer (RCC), renal CH (RCH), renal PA (RPA), skin cancer (Skin), stomach cancer (Stomach), testis cancer (Testis), thyroid cancer (Thyroid), uterine CS cancer (UCS), and uterine EC (UEC). *: Mann-Whitney p<0.05 and expression >10 in tumor or normal tissue. (E-F) Patient-derived <t>HCC</t> <t>SNU-423-CO</t> organoids were treated with sorafenib with and without spermine or sphingosine for 6 days. (E) Representative images were obtained using a confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( F ) Organoid formation efficiency and cell viability were assessed by CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. The relative organoid cell viability was plotted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
    Human Hcc Cell Lines Hep3b, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc cell lines hep3b/product/ATCC
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc cell lines hep3b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hcc
    Clinical relevance of SMOX , CERS1 , and SPHK1 expression and combining effects of sorafenib with spermine or sphingosine in <t>HCC</t> organoids. (A-B) The overall survival rates of liver cancer patients in TCGA were plotted according to the expression levels of the SMOX metabolic enzyme of spermine (A) and the CERS1 and SPHK1 metabolic enzymes of sphingosine (B) using KM Plotter. (C-D) The relative gene expression of SMOX (C) and SPHK1 (D) in normal (left) and tumor (right) tissues from adrenal cancer (Adrenal), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), bladder cancer (Bladder), breast cancer (Breast), colon cancer (Colon), esophageal cancer (Esoph), liver cancer (Liver), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), ovary cancer (Ovary), pancreatic cancer (Pancreas), prostate cancer (Prostate), rectal cancer (Rectum), renal clear cell cancer (RCC), renal CH (RCH), renal PA (RPA), skin cancer (Skin), stomach cancer (Stomach), testis cancer (Testis), thyroid cancer (Thyroid), uterine CS cancer (UCS), and uterine EC (UEC). *: Mann-Whitney p<0.05 and expression >10 in tumor or normal tissue. (E-F) Patient-derived <t>HCC</t> <t>SNU-423-CO</t> organoids were treated with sorafenib with and without spermine or sphingosine for 6 days. (E) Representative images were obtained using a confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( F ) Organoid formation efficiency and cell viability were assessed by CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. The relative organoid cell viability was plotted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
    Human Hcc, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hcc cell line hepg2
    Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. <t>HepG2</t> cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.
    Human Hcc Cell Line Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc cell line hepg2/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc cell line hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC isolation 132 human hcc hepg2 cell lines
    Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. <t>HepG2</t> cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.
    Isolation 132 Human Hcc Hepg2 Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/isolation 132 human hcc hepg2 cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    isolation 132 human hcc hepg2 cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC human hcc cell lines
    Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. <t>HepG2</t> cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.
    Human Hcc Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human hcc cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hcc cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    ATCC hepatocellular carcinoma tumor cell human hcc cell lines
    Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. <t>HepG2</t> cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.
    Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Cell Human Hcc Cell Lines, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/hepatocellular carcinoma tumor cell human hcc cell lines/product/ATCC
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hepatocellular carcinoma tumor cell human hcc cell lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Clinical relevance of SMOX , CERS1 , and SPHK1 expression and combining effects of sorafenib with spermine or sphingosine in HCC organoids. (A-B) The overall survival rates of liver cancer patients in TCGA were plotted according to the expression levels of the SMOX metabolic enzyme of spermine (A) and the CERS1 and SPHK1 metabolic enzymes of sphingosine (B) using KM Plotter. (C-D) The relative gene expression of SMOX (C) and SPHK1 (D) in normal (left) and tumor (right) tissues from adrenal cancer (Adrenal), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), bladder cancer (Bladder), breast cancer (Breast), colon cancer (Colon), esophageal cancer (Esoph), liver cancer (Liver), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), ovary cancer (Ovary), pancreatic cancer (Pancreas), prostate cancer (Prostate), rectal cancer (Rectum), renal clear cell cancer (RCC), renal CH (RCH), renal PA (RPA), skin cancer (Skin), stomach cancer (Stomach), testis cancer (Testis), thyroid cancer (Thyroid), uterine CS cancer (UCS), and uterine EC (UEC). *: Mann-Whitney p<0.05 and expression >10 in tumor or normal tissue. (E-F) Patient-derived HCC SNU-423-CO organoids were treated with sorafenib with and without spermine or sphingosine for 6 days. (E) Representative images were obtained using a confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( F ) Organoid formation efficiency and cell viability were assessed by CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. The relative organoid cell viability was plotted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

    Journal: International Journal of Biological Sciences

    Article Title: Combining sorafenib with spermine and sphingosine synergistically enhances anticancer efficacy by modulating metabolic pathways and gut microbiome in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.7150/ijbs.118753

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical relevance of SMOX , CERS1 , and SPHK1 expression and combining effects of sorafenib with spermine or sphingosine in HCC organoids. (A-B) The overall survival rates of liver cancer patients in TCGA were plotted according to the expression levels of the SMOX metabolic enzyme of spermine (A) and the CERS1 and SPHK1 metabolic enzymes of sphingosine (B) using KM Plotter. (C-D) The relative gene expression of SMOX (C) and SPHK1 (D) in normal (left) and tumor (right) tissues from adrenal cancer (Adrenal), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), bladder cancer (Bladder), breast cancer (Breast), colon cancer (Colon), esophageal cancer (Esoph), liver cancer (Liver), lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSQ), ovary cancer (Ovary), pancreatic cancer (Pancreas), prostate cancer (Prostate), rectal cancer (Rectum), renal clear cell cancer (RCC), renal CH (RCH), renal PA (RPA), skin cancer (Skin), stomach cancer (Stomach), testis cancer (Testis), thyroid cancer (Thyroid), uterine CS cancer (UCS), and uterine EC (UEC). *: Mann-Whitney p<0.05 and expression >10 in tumor or normal tissue. (E-F) Patient-derived HCC SNU-423-CO organoids were treated with sorafenib with and without spermine or sphingosine for 6 days. (E) Representative images were obtained using a confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( F ) Organoid formation efficiency and cell viability were assessed by CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. The relative organoid cell viability was plotted. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Patient-derived HCC SNU-423-CO organoids were obtained from KCLB (Seoul, Korea) and maintained using the human HCC organoid culture kit (Med Chem Express, Princeton, NJ, USA), supplemented with 50 ng/ml EGF, 100 ng/ml FGF, 25 ng/ml HGF, 10 mM forskolin, 1 × B27, 10 mM nicotinamide, 5 mM A83-01, 1.25 mM N-acetylcysteine, and 50 mg/ml primocin .

    Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression, MANN-WHITNEY, Derivative Assay, Microscopy

    Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. HepG2 cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.

    Journal: Translational Oncology

    Article Title: β-Sitosterol enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma via the FXR/LXR/ SREBP1/ FASN pathway

    doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102610

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Antitumor effects of SIT and combined treatment on HCC cells. HepG2 cells (A) and Hepa1–6 cells (B) were administrated SIT, sorafenib, and sorafenib + SIT at serial concentrations, and Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assays were used to determine the cell viability. HepG2 cells (C) and Hepa1–6 cells (D) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell proliferation was evaluated using the 5-ethynyl-29-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. HepG2 cells (E) and Hepa1–6 cells (F) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and cell apoptosis induction was evaluated using flow cytometry. Hepa1–6 cells (G) were treated with SIT (2 μM), sorafenib (10 μM) or a combination of both, and vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation was evaluated in three-dimensional culture. Data were presented as mean ± SEM, n = 3, One-way ANOVA. * p < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001; and **** p < .0001.

    Article Snippet: The human HCC cell line HepG2 and the murine HCC cell line Hepa1–6 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection.

    Techniques: Cell Counting, CCK-8 Assay, EdU Assay, Flow Cytometry